Skip Navigation

Refugee Survey Quarterly 2007 26(3):119-135; doi:10.1093/rsq/hdi0247
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© UNHCR 2007, all rights reserved

Refugee research agendas: the influence of donors and North-South partnerships

Megan Bradley *

St Antony's College, University of Oxford, United Kingdom


  Abstract

This paper examines how refugee studies and forced migration research agendas have been shaped by donor policies, and in particular by donors' support for North-South research partnerships. The first part of this paper considers the nature of donors' influence on forced migration research agendas, and contextualises donor support for forced migration research within broader trends in the financing of developmentrelated research, including increased assistance for multidisciplinary, multi-stakeholder research, and the primacy of ‘policy-relevant’ research. The second section focuses on the implications of donors' tendency to support forced migration research through North-South partnerships. In this section, I explore researchers' motivations for entering into such partnerships, and discuss the obstacles they may entail for Southern researchers trying to articulate and advance their own agendas. At their best, North-South research partnerships are a source of mutual learning and capacity building that stimulate academic debates while successfully contributing to efforts to protect and assist the displaced. However, I contend that donors and researchers alike are well-advised to be frank about the limitations of this approach and use it only judiciously, as North-South partnerships are not necessarily the most productive way to advance research agendas grounded in the concerns and perspectives of Southern actor.

Key Words: refugees • research • research agendas • donors • funding • partnerships • North and South

* Megan Bradley is a doctoral candidate in international relations at St Antony's College, University of Oxford. This research was carried out with the support of the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) Training and Awards Program. The views expressed in this article are the author's own, and do not necessarily refl ect the opinions or positions of IDRC.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.