Skip Navigation

Refugee Survey Quarterly 2008 27(3):110-127; doi:10.1093/rsq/hdn034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newman, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Steel, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© UNHCR [2008]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Refugee Survey Quarterly issue: ASYLUM AND THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS [View the issue table of contents]

Asylum, Detention, and Mental Health in Australia

Louise K. Newman, Michael Dudley and Zachary Steel*

* Louise K. Newman is a professor of Perinatal and Infant Psychiatry at the School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Australia. Michael Dudley is a conjoint senior lecturer at the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Australia and Sydney Children's Hospital; Chair, Suicide Prevention Australia. Zachary Steel, who holds a M. Psychol (Clinical), works at the Centre for Population Mental Health Research, Sydney South West Area Health Service and at the Psychiatry Research and Teaching Unit, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Australia.


   Abstract

Seeking asylum in the face of persecution is a fundamental human right. The system of arbitrary mandatory detention operating under Australian immigration law since 1992 has impacted on more than 15,000 adults and children, many with traumatic experiences in their country of origin. Restrictions on entry to the mainland, policies of "deterrence", including prolonged detention in remote camps, and inadequate responses to trauma and mental health needs have contributed to mental deterioration and suffering of asylum-seekers. The responses of mental health professionals, lawyers, human rights advocates, and community groups to the detention system have focused on the need to protect the right to seek asylum and the need for a humane response to asylum-seekers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.